<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Liberal Forum &#187; tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialliberal.net/tag/tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialliberal.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Did the budget meet my tests?</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/24/did-the-budget-meet-my-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/24/did-the-budget-meet-my-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office of budget responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brief note, reflecting on the criteria by which I proposed we should judge the budget, now it has sunk in: What is the timescale? 5 years, so this is a clear Conservative victory. I am deeply concerned about this, &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/24/did-the-budget-meet-my-tests/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/24/did-the-budget-meet-my-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How should we evaluate the budget?</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/22/how-should-we-evaluate-the-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/22/how-should-we-evaluate-the-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless of what Liberal Democrats might like the budget to be tomorrow, we always knew it was going to be a compromise between the Lib Dems and Conservatives in government. The Parliamentary arithmetic always meant that the Lib Dems&#8217; game &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/22/how-should-we-evaluate-the-budget/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/22/how-should-we-evaluate-the-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intergenerational equity and the perils of groupthink</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/20/intergenerational-equity-and-the-perils-of-groupthink/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/20/intergenerational-equity-and-the-perils-of-groupthink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intergenerational-equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crossposted from Quaequam Blog! As the implications of what it appears that the coalition is about to do in the upcoming budget sinks in, I have to admit to growing increasingly concerned. No-one &#8211; outside of the Labour leadership contest &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/20/intergenerational-equity-and-the-perils-of-groupthink/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/20/intergenerational-equity-and-the-perils-of-groupthink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What motions should we table to autumn conference?</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/16/autumn-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/16/autumn-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office of budget responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crossposted from the Social Liberal Forum social network. The deadline for autumn conference motions is looming (30 June to be precise), so we don&#8217;t have much time.  But what should the Social Liberal Forum be championing to get onto the &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/16/autumn-conference/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/16/autumn-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hughes, Bruce and Oakeshott express concerns over Capital Gains Tax plans</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/hughes-bruce-and-oakeshott-express-concerns-over-capital-gains-tax-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/hughes-bruce-and-oakeshott-express-concerns-over-capital-gains-tax-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital gains tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malcolm bruce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthew oakeshott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simon hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following on from the Social Liberal Forum&#8217;s open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander about the emergency budget, three prominent Liberal Democrat parliamentarians have echoed our concern on Capital Gains Tax. The FT reports that Lord Oakeshott, Malcolm Bruce &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/hughes-bruce-and-oakeshott-express-concerns-over-capital-gains-tax-plans/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/hughes-bruce-and-oakeshott-express-concerns-over-capital-gains-tax-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following our mini-consultation a few days ago, we have written the following letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander outlining our concerns about the upcoming Emergency Budget. Thanks to everyone who submitted their ideas, both on our website and privately &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No tax rises ever? Say it ain&#8217;t so, Nick!</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/no-tax-rises-ever-say-it-aint-so-nick/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/no-tax-rises-ever-say-it-aint-so-nick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hall-Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Hall-Matthews’ speech on Motion “Growth that lasts: A fair, green and sustainable economy.” Conference, I am speaking in favour of lines 22-23: “a fair and sustainable economy means delivering growth that lasts, through&#8230; honesty about the tough choices needed &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/no-tax-rises-ever-say-it-aint-so-nick/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/no-tax-rises-ever-say-it-aint-so-nick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fabians fail the fairness test</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/fabians-fail-the-fairness-test/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/fabians-fail-the-fairness-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabian society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left foot forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not having decent internet access over the weekend at Lib Dem conference, I&#8217;ve been itching to get my paws on the latest Left Foot Forward report on the Lib Dem proposal to raise the income tax threshold to £10,000. &#8220;Think &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/fabians-fail-the-fairness-test/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/fabians-fail-the-fairness-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Message to Nick Clegg: spread the pain, don&#8217;t just cut services</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/12/message-to-nick-clegg-spread-the-pain-dont-just-cut-services/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/12/message-to-nick-clegg-spread-the-pain-dont-just-cut-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>socialliberalforum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Social Liberal Forum believes Nick Clegg’s newly promulgated policy to rely on spending cuts raises serious questions. We believe that this policy has to take into account the following issues: It could require even deeper cuts in areas like &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/12/message-to-nick-clegg-spread-the-pain-dont-just-cut-services/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/12/message-to-nick-clegg-spread-the-pain-dont-just-cut-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robin Hood Tax? Beware the men in tights</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/11/robin-hood-tax-beware-the-men-in-tights/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/11/robin-hood-tax-beware-the-men-in-tights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robin hood tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobin tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to support the new campaign for a &#8220;Robin Hood Tax&#8221; &#8211; really I do. I understand the logic behind the Tobin Tax and have a lot of sympathy for the idea. But there&#8217;s something about this campaign&#8230; Actually, &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/11/robin-hood-tax-beware-the-men-in-tights/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/11/robin-hood-tax-beware-the-men-in-tights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

