<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Liberal Forum &#187; nhs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialliberal.net/tag/nhs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialliberal.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Liberal Democrats should continue to debate whether to support the Health and Social Care Bill</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2012/01/26/liberal-democrats-should-continue-to-debate-whether-to-support-the-health-and-social-care-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2012/01/26/liberal-democrats-should-continue-to-debate-whether-to-support-the-health-and-social-care-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prateekbuch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles west]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evan harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health and social care bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shirley williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=1390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the welcome and significant changes to the Health &#38; Social Care Bill that Lib Dem parliamentarians have secured, there remain serious concerns both within the party, Parliament and the medical profession about the impact and timing of the reforms. As &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2012/01/26/liberal-democrats-should-continue-to-debate-whether-to-support-the-health-and-social-care-bill/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2012/01/26/liberal-democrats-should-continue-to-debate-whether-to-support-the-health-and-social-care-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lord Smith of Clifton writes: trends and tendencies in contemporary UK politics and the future of the Lib Dems</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2012/01/10/1381/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2012/01/10/1381/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord Smith of Clifton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=1381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Preamble: Trevor Smith joined the Liberal Party in 1955 when it had five MPs; he fears he may die with the LibDems having the same number!) The Lib Dems are in a very serious state, possibly facing meltdown of the &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2012/01/10/1381/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2012/01/10/1381/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better a localist NHS than a nationalist one</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/18/a-positive-alternative-to-labours-nationalist-health-service/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/18/a-positive-alternative-to-labours-nationalist-health-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andy burnham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[localism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Health Secretary Andy Burnham wrote an article for the Guardian aiming to set out the clear blue water between Labour and the Conservatives on the National Health Service. In doing so, he inadvertantly demonstrated quite how vapid Labour&#8217;s vision &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/18/a-positive-alternative-to-labours-nationalist-health-service/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/18/a-positive-alternative-to-labours-nationalist-health-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We love the NHS</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/12/we-love-the-nhs/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/12/we-love-the-nhs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welovethenhs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate in the us about healthcare seems to be getting increasingly insane, with Obama being compared to Hitler, Sarah Palin spreading lies about &#8220;death panels&#8221; and assorted nonsense. A repeat of the debate in the early 1990s when the &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/12/we-love-the-nhs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/12/we-love-the-nhs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

