Tag Archives: education

Gove a ‘romantic idealist’?

Plans for so-called ‘free schools’ announced by the Secretary of State recognise the need to improve the education for all pupils; harnessing the enthusiasm of new groups offers the chance to widen community involvement in education.

But, like a 1960s child of the flower power revolution, Mr Gove seems more intent on letting a 1,000 flowers bloom than on ensuring a school system fit for purpose and offering value for money in a time of austerity.

Schools in England have always been run by a diverse group of bodies ranging from faith groups to livery companies. Letting teachers take charge in the same manner as other professionals who would routinely expect to be free to run their own organisations offers new opportunities that can significantly reduce differences in attainment levels between different groups in society.

Assisted by a Liberal Democrat inspired pupil premium funding model, we could be on the verge of creating a high quality education system for all for the first time in a generation.

However, any new opportunities must be cost effective in a period of austerity, and must operate within a clear framework of accountability that covers all schools.

Pupils will still miss school, some will be expelled, others will develop special needs and many will move homes each year. Creating new schools is the easy part, developing the framework that allows them to succeed alongside other successful schools calls for more vision and knowledge than the Secretary of State has so far displayed.

As a Liberal Democrat, I believe in striving for excellent education for all; nothing less is acceptable. But, schools cannot exist in isolation from each other without the risk of some of the very pupils Mr Gove is concerned about slipping through the net.

Announcing ‘free schools’ and ‘grant maintained academies’ is the easy part: the hard slog of achieving success for all now starts. I am sure that Liberal Democrats will play their part in the coalition as the goals espoused by Mr Gove fit our aspirations. But, he will need to demonstrate how his ideas work for every child, and not just the few.

John Howson is the President of the Liberal Democrat Education association. He writes here in a personal capacity

What motions should we table to autumn conference?

Crossposted from the Social Liberal Forum social network.

The deadline for autumn conference motions is looming (30 June to be precise), so we don’t have much time.  But what should the Social Liberal Forum be championing to get onto the agenda?  Here are some ideas:

  • Secondary education – academies and free schools in particular – appears to be a simmering issue (see John Howson’s article on the SLF website).  Should we push for ensuring that the academies system is brought under greater local control and scrutiny?  What else?
  • Higher education: tuitions fees is clearly a big issue.  Is there a way of squaring the circle? Move towards a graduate tax?
  • Wealth taxation: the Tories struck anything even vaguely resembling a wealth tax from the coalition agreement.  This is an area in which the Lib Dems and Tories have a clear difference.  Is now the time to set out a strategy to make it clear we are a distinctive party?
  • The Office of Budget Responsibility: as we spelt out in the SLF letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander, the OBR doesn’t currently have monitoring socio-economic inequality written into its terms of reference, despite the Treasury having to consider this under the Equality Act 2010. What’s more, despite being formally independent, its members are directly appointed by the Chancellor.  Shouldn’t it be subject to a confirmation hearing by the Treasury select committee (or, better yet, appointed by parliament in the same way that the Electoral Commission is)?

These are just a handful of ideas from off the top of my head.  Feedback welcome on these – as of course are other ideas.  Add your comments below.

Stop wasting money Mr Gove

Sign the petition.

Ideology rather than efficiency seems to be the Watchword in Sanctuary Buildings, the home of Mr Gove’s Department for Schools. Not content with wasting money on changing the name of his department, the only minister to do so, Mr Gove has rushed out his Academies Bill, or Grant Maintained Schools (Academies) Bill as it ought really to be known. For the Tory academies are really only grant maintained schools with another name.

The present Chief Secretary to the Treasury has the advantage of coming from Scotland where, although the relations between the parliament and local authorities can be fraught, there is a clear recognition of where the responsibility for education lies. He ought to look carefully at the Academy Bill and ask what the potential financial effect of the proposed legislation is.

Apart from the obvious diseconomies of scale if local authorities are left with an unpredictable number of schools not willing or able to take the opt out route, and why would a school that spends more than the local average want to do become a GMA if it lost income in the process, there is still the need to plan for the future, to regulate, to chase up parents who don’t send their offspring to school and to deal with excluded pupils.

The Funding Agency for Schools, the body responsible for GM schools last time around, made it clear in one of its final reports that there would be a shortage of secondary school places in parts of London; and so there was early in this century as no one body had overall responsibility for planning. Such a nightmare will result unless a new planning body is established for GMAs. For this reason alone, the Bill deserves to be shelved until a more comprehensive look at schooling, including plans for both new providers and a pupil premium as a method of funding can be discussed. It would be plain daft if a school was given money on becoming a GMA only to have it taken away under the new PP formula. But, perhaps that’s Gove’s real aim, to protect schools that won’t see any funding gain under a pupil premium, and might lose money if the Chancellor cannot find extra money for schools as the Liberal Democrats pledged.

GMAs will join their Labour counterparts in becoming free from national pay scales. Experience to date has shown that such a freedom, as exercised by Labour’s academies, has had an upward pressure on salaries. Some leadership teams in particular have benefitted significantly from enhanced salaries with little or no monitoring as to value for money. The lack of regulation can produce an ‘unacceptable face of capitalism’ as governments down the years have discovered.

Individual schools need to fit within a coherent framework regardless of who runs each separate institution. Too many Tory advisers don’t understand this, and their local government colleagues have failed to be robust enough with their Westminster colleagues.

Liberal Democrats place a high value on education, and cannot afford for scarce resources to be wasted during this period of austerity government. The Academies Bill should never have seen the light of coalition government, and should now be shelved. There may need to be a fresh look at education in this country, but a rushed Bill is not the way to do it; it should be dumped.

Sign the petition.

John Howson President of the Liberal Democrat Education Association and has advised various Liberal Democrat education spokespersons over the past 13 years. He writes here in a personal capacity.