<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Liberal Forum &#187; economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialliberal.net/tag/economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialliberal.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Did the budget meet my tests?</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/24/did-the-budget-meet-my-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/24/did-the-budget-meet-my-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office of budget responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brief note, reflecting on the criteria by which I proposed we should judge the budget, now it has sunk in: What is the timescale? 5 years, so this is a clear Conservative victory. I am deeply concerned about this, &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/24/did-the-budget-meet-my-tests/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/24/did-the-budget-meet-my-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intergenerational equity and the perils of groupthink</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/20/intergenerational-equity-and-the-perils-of-groupthink/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/20/intergenerational-equity-and-the-perils-of-groupthink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intergenerational-equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crossposted from Quaequam Blog! As the implications of what it appears that the coalition is about to do in the upcoming budget sinks in, I have to admit to growing increasingly concerned. No-one &#8211; outside of the Labour leadership contest &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/20/intergenerational-equity-and-the-perils-of-groupthink/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/20/intergenerational-equity-and-the-perils-of-groupthink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No tax rises ever? Say it ain&#8217;t so, Nick!</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/no-tax-rises-ever-say-it-aint-so-nick/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/no-tax-rises-ever-say-it-aint-so-nick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Hall-Matthews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Hall-Matthews’ speech on Motion “Growth that lasts: A fair, green and sustainable economy.” Conference, I am speaking in favour of lines 22-23: “a fair and sustainable economy means delivering growth that lasts, through&#8230; honesty about the tough choices needed &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/no-tax-rises-ever-say-it-aint-so-nick/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/no-tax-rises-ever-say-it-aint-so-nick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Message to Nick Clegg: spread the pain, don&#8217;t just cut services</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/12/message-to-nick-clegg-spread-the-pain-dont-just-cut-services/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/12/message-to-nick-clegg-spread-the-pain-dont-just-cut-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>socialliberalforum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Social Liberal Forum believes Nick Clegg’s newly promulgated policy to rely on spending cuts raises serious questions. We believe that this policy has to take into account the following issues: It could require even deeper cuts in areas like &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/12/message-to-nick-clegg-spread-the-pain-dont-just-cut-services/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/12/message-to-nick-clegg-spread-the-pain-dont-just-cut-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News roundup</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/01/news-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/01/news-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labour is reported to be putting cooperative principles at the heart of its 2010 manifesto.  Anyone remember the third way? Nick Clegg is spelling out today how the Liberal Democrats propose to pay for its flagship &#8216;pupil premium&#8216; policy for &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/01/news-roundup/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/01/news-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land Value Tax NOW</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2009/04/05/land-value-tax-now/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2009/04/05/land-value-tax-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Ideas Factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land value taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ideas Factory is a chance for you to pitch your own idea of what should be in the next Liberal Democrat manifesto. The proposal here is not the policy of the Social Liberal Forum. We will however be passing &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2009/04/05/land-value-tax-now/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2009/04/05/land-value-tax-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No turning back? A response to Compass</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2009/03/09/no-turning-back-a-response-to-compass/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2009/03/09/no-turning-back-a-response-to-compass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Grayson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the launch of the Social Liberal Forum in Harrogate, there was considerable enthusiasm among those attending for talking to people outside the Liberal Democrats where there is scope for developing policy ideas together. One organisation specifically suggested was Compass. &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2009/03/09/no-turning-back-a-response-to-compass/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2009/03/09/no-turning-back-a-response-to-compass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

