<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Liberal Forum &#187; conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialliberal.net/tag/conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialliberal.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will we get fairer taxes under the coalition?</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/10/will-we-get-fairer-taxes-under-the-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/10/will-we-get-fairer-taxes-under-the-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital gains tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago I wrote about the regressive alliance seeking to undermine the new coalition government at every turn.  If that seemed vague and abstract then, it certainly doesn&#8217;t any more. We should at least respect the Daily &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/10/will-we-get-fairer-taxes-under-the-coalition/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/10/will-we-get-fairer-taxes-under-the-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tories&#8217; boneheaded priorities</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/11/the-tories-boneheaded-priorities/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/11/the-tories-boneheaded-priorities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can only speculate what the Tory campaigns department were thinkin when they launched the now much-spoofed &#8220;R.I.P. OFF&#8221; poster. In a nutshell it demonstrates all that is wrong with David Cameron&#8217;s Conservatives: naive and focused on the wrong priorities. &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/11/the-tories-boneheaded-priorities/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/11/the-tories-boneheaded-priorities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Roundup</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/02/news-roundup-2/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/02/news-roundup-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gordon brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate change science has been dealt another blow by the revelation that University of East Anglia professor Phil Jones knowingly used flawed evidence in one of his studies.  How many more revelations like this will we have before the scientific &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/02/news-roundup-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/02/news-roundup-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News roundup</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/01/news-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/01/news-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labour is reported to be putting cooperative principles at the heart of its 2010 manifesto.  Anyone remember the third way? Nick Clegg is spelling out today how the Liberal Democrats propose to pay for its flagship &#8216;pupil premium&#8216; policy for &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/01/news-roundup/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/02/01/news-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is nothing random about local control of public services</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/09/there-is-nothing-random-about-local-control-of-public-services/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/09/there-is-nothing-random-about-local-control-of-public-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 10:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fabian society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grant shapps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[localism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postcode lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunder katwala]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both Sunder Katwala and Grant Shapps are quite wrong: not only is local variation a price more than worth paying for local control, but it would end the phenomena of postcode lotteries. &#8220;Postcode lottery&#8221; is a cliché, and a peculiarly &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/09/there-is-nothing-random-about-local-control-of-public-services/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/09/there-is-nothing-random-about-local-control-of-public-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

