Category Archives: News Roundup

LibDem NHS Activists heartened by extent of health rebellion

Lib Dem NHS activists take heart from extent of Parliamentary rebellion as new analysis shows “two-thirds of MPs” withhold support from Government on health bill.

Liberal Democrat activists and Parliamentarians seeking to amend the Health Bill today released an analysis of the Report Stage votes , based on House of Commons Library figures , showing that more than  two thirds of the eligible  English Lib Dem Backbench  MPs failed to support the government on key votes, the  vast  majority of whom voted against the government at some point.

The figures showed that,  of the  24 Liberal Democrat English backbenchers who are neither on the Government payroll, no Ministerial aides, abroad or disqualified from voting (as chair of the Bill Committee), 16  failed to support the Government in at least one of the three main votes on the Bill at report stage (on amendments to retain the private patient cap, to retain the Secretary of State’s duty to secure provision of health services, and on the 3rd reading of the Bill).

The majority of those, 11, voted against the Government on at least one of the divisions.

Commenting on this, Andrew George MP (who tabled the amendments) said,

“There is an underlying unease about the Bill amongst my colleagues. Although I knew I was not alone I hadn’t anticipated a rebellion on this scale.  Liberal Democrats  were the architects of the NHS  and do not want, by default, to become the architects of its demise.”   

Those of us who voted to ask the Government to reflect on the folly of carrying on with the Bill in its present form will be vindicated with further concessions in the Lords.”

Dr.Evan Harris, a former party health spokesman and a Vice-Chair of the party’s Federal Policy Committee, said, “The extent of unhappiness on the Lib Dem backbenches, is a real encouragement to Baroness  Shirley Williams and her cross-party colleagues in the Lords as they seek to make major changes to the Bill.”  

The vast majority of activists at our conference have only ever wanted the government’s health policies and the Bill to go no further than the Coalition Agreement. The amendments tabled yesterday and our party conference motions are only seeking to restrict the government to the Coalition Agreement that the party voted for. ”

Dr. Graham Winyard, Chair of Winchester LD and a former NHS Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England said, “Full credit needs to be given to Nick Clegg and Paul Burstow for securing the changes already made to the Bill following the Party’s spring conference.   

“However it is clear that further change is necessary before many Liberal Democrats can support it. We were encouraged by the clear hints given by Paul Burstow that the government would seek to make changes to the Bill.

 

Notes:

1. The 10 Lib Dem MPs who voted against the Government, in favour of Amendment 1176 (Division 340) were  Annette Brooke, Tim Farron, Andrew George, Martin Horwood, Julian Huppert, Stephen Lloyd, John Pugh, Dan Rogerson, Adrian Sanders and David Ward.

Those who abstained were  Stephen Gilbert, Simon Hughes,  John Leech and Greg Mulholland

2. The 4 Lib Dem MPs who voted against the Government for the Third Reading of the Bill (Division 342) were: Andrew George, Julian Huppert, Greg Mulholland and Adrian Sanders.

Those who abstained were  Annette Brooke,Tim Farron, Martin Horwood, Stephen Gilbert, John Pugh  and Dan Rogerson

3. The 3 Lib Dem MPs who voted against the Government on Amendment 1165 on Private Health Care (Division 338) are Andrew George, Martin Horwood and Adrian Sanders.

Those who abstained were Annette Brooke,  Tim Farron, Simon Hughes, Julian Huppert, John Leech, Greg Mulholland, John Pugh, Dan Rogerson,  Ian Swales,  Stephen Williams

 

Report on the Social Liberal Forum (Scotland) Meeting in Glasgow on 25 June

A small but vocal group of Lib Dem activists came together last Saturday in Glasgow to debate the current state of and prospects for the Party in Scotland.  Although mostly drawn from Glasgow and the West of Scotland members travelled from as far afield as Irvine, Bo’ness, Edinburgh and the North of England.

The meeting heard a comprehensive report of the London Conference of the Forum on 18 June and were treated to a rousing speech from our regrettably ex-MSP for Glasgow Region, Robert Brown.  Robert’s speech has been posted in full on Caron Lindsay’s blog here.

The Q and A session that followed Robert’s speech and a series of short discussions in an Open Forum session produced the observations below:

UK Coalition

Attitudes to the Party leadership and the coalition varied but outright praise for both was muted.  Some speakers felt strongly that Nick Clegg should have resigned after the disaster of the May local and Scottish Parliament elections.  There was also condemnation of the leadership’s stance of apparently accepting the necessity of adopting Tory policy on cuts and tuition fees before the general election and yet campaigning otherwise during it.  The often passive, equivocal role that the Westminster Parliamentary Party appears to be playing was criticised.  In particular there was dislike of the way that Liberal Democrat spokesmen are being seen to champion Tory policies which run counter to Liberal Democrat principles of supporting the freedom of the individual within a supportive state and a strong and stable society.   Danny Alexander and Nick Clegg drew particular comment for appearing to relish the announcement of the cuts programme.

Whilst there was broad acceptance of the rationale for coalition there was limited enthusiasm for the end result.  It was felt that trumpeting the achievement of 90% of our manifesto was useless when it was our support that permitted the Tories to push through a raft of their own policies that our members and voters consider unacceptable.  As an example, public pensions are already affordable yet we are supporting the current further Conservative attack on them.  We need to distance ourselves more from the Tories and better publicise the distinctiveness of our successes.

The failure of the leadership to adequately prepare for coalition negotiations or to learn the lessons garnered in Scotland and Wales in running coalition administrations was noted.  It was felt that the coalition agreement should be re-visited to make it more flexible in dealing with inter-party disagreement and the development of new policies.  The lay Party should also seek to take ownership of the agreement through Federal Conference.

The Scottish Party and Parliament

The Scottish Executive was strongly attacked as being remote, weak and ineffective.  It produces annual action plans that it does not publicise and has presided over a withering away of Party policy-making.  Party membership is declining swiftly without any action being taken and the Party has organisational and structural difficulties that are not being addressed.  In addition, senior figures in the Scottish Party are not doing enough to project a strong Scottish voice at Federal level.

The Scottish Parliamentary Party It was felt that the Party had become too prone to criticise what it disliked without proposing alternatives.  It seemed at times during the last Parliament that the entire rationale of the Party was to bash the Nats.  We need to concentrate more on cooperation to achieve success where our policies are close to other parties.  It was felt that less attention should be paid to focus groups and more effort put into developing our own distinctive vision.  There are encouraging indications that the new leader is taking these views on board.  We also need to better articulate our wish for more powers for the Scottish Parliament and in this connection it was felt that neither the Westminster Parliamentary party nor the Federal Executive really understand the implications and necessities of devolution and that they need to raise their game in this respect.

Scottish Council Elections 2012

The councillors present voiced their horror at the electoral prospects for next year.  At best it will be an election where we fight to hold what we have.  Again it was felt that the leadership was out of touch with the havoc being wrought by its actions and there was a need for the Scottish Leader to distance himself from coalition policy.  It was felt that the best way ahead was to champion a revitalised form of community politics where there is concern to foster effective communities and effectively devolve power.

What Role Should the SLF seek to undertake in Scotland

The SLF in Scotland should formalise its role and seek influence and change within the Party.  It should seek to promote debate within the Party on tactics and values and take policy initiatives to Scottish Conference.

Hughes, Bruce and Oakeshott express concerns over Capital Gains Tax plans

Following on from the Social Liberal Forum’s open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander about the emergency budget, three prominent Liberal Democrat parliamentarians have echoed our concern on Capital Gains Tax.

The FT reports that Lord Oakeshott, Malcolm Bruce and new Lib Dem Deputy Leader Simon Hughes also advising Nick Clegg not to capitulate.

Simon Hughes told the FT that he was “trusting [the chancellor and chief secretary] will find a way of squaring the circle that colleagues in my party can sign up to and that will send a message to colleagues around the edges that they can’t suddenly change the game after the rules have been agreed”.

Lord Oakeshott, Lib Dem Treasury spokesman in the Lords, urged Mr Osborne to turn a deaf ear to the “great deal of noise” from right-wing MPs, who were “trying to chip away at this agreed programme”.

“Taper relief, as Vince Cable [the Lib Dem business secretary] has made clear, is an open invitation to avoidance. It is complicated and just does not work,” he said in the House of Lords debate on the Queens Speech last week.

Finally Malcolm Bruce told the FT that he would “share the unease if they backed off too much and weren’t able to raise the income tax threshold.”

Meanwhile, our own letter has been reported prominently in the Guardian today.

News Roundup

The Guardian continues its coverage of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes ongoing woes.

It also carries an interview with Conservative leader of Barnet Council Mike Freer and his “easyCouncil” model (as a Barnet resident, I was interested to see that my council tax was spent on clearing up all the grit on the pavement on Monday and putting back more grit on Tuesday – value for money FTW!).

The Tories have been attacked for publishing misleading crime statistics in such a way that makes a couple of cock ups by the IPCC look insignificant. Chris Grayling is unreprentent.

And finally, Gordon Brown announced a range of intended constitutional reforms yesterday in a speech to the RSA. Most of the coverage has focused on his plans for a referendum to reform the electoral system, but more radically he also announced his intention for the UK to have a written constitution by the 800th anniversary of the signing of the Magna Carta in 2015. Exciting stuff but given Brown’s track record, could he deliver?

News Roundup

Climate change science has been dealt another blow by the revelation that University of East Anglia professor Phil Jones knowingly used flawed evidence in one of his studies.  How many more revelations like this will we have before the scientific community learn the lesson that transparency is the only way to ensure public trust?

Meanwhile, a man not especially reknowned for his valuing of science, Pope Benedict, has been condemning UK equality laws.  Some people are more equal than others in the eye of God, it would seem.

Talking of equality, Gordon Brown appears to have finally come off the fence when it comes to electoral reform.  The Alternative Vote system isn’t proportional but it would mean all MPs would have to command a majority and it would mean fewer wasted votes.  The Lib Dem response, as Stephen Tall points out, has been a “stinging welcome“.  It would appear that the government will be announcing support for a whole host of amendments to the Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill today, including ones regarding Lords reform and excluding non-doms from Parliament.

The latest ComRes/Independent poll confirms that the gap in support between the main parties has narrowed in recent weeks, with the public deeply confused about what passes for David Cameron’s economic policy.  Interestingly, Tory support amongst men is currently much higher than Tory support amongst women.

News roundup

Labour is reported to be putting cooperative principles at the heart of its 2010 manifesto.  Anyone remember the third way?

Nick Clegg is spelling out today how the Liberal Democrats propose to pay for its flagship ‘pupil premium‘ policy for education.

David Cameron is continuing to confuse over both the economy and human rights.  Despite the Tory policy of making immediate cuts, we are now to understand they won’t be ‘swingeing’.  Meanwhile, he has asserted that burglars lose their human rights as soon as they set foot in someone else’s property, suggesting he is not so much in support of ‘have a go heroes’ as ‘have a gimp heroes’.

Head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Rajendra Pachauri’s position is looking increasingly untenable with the revelation that he sat on the discovery that one of the IPCC’s claims about melting glaciers was without foundation before the Copenhagen summit. Other claims are being disputed as well.  With the scientific community still reeling from the University of East Anglia email hacking scandal, it is clear that a concerted effort needs to be made to ensure that climate science is seen to be robust and open to scrutiny.