<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Liberal Forum &#187; Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialliberal.net/category/debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialliberal.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time to review student funding?</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2011/06/07/time-to-review-student-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2011/06/07/time-to-review-student-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuition fees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After all the pain the Lib Dems went through with the student funding policy, the least we could expect is that it would do what it said on the tin. But that has turned out not to be the case. &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2011/06/07/time-to-review-student-funding/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2011/06/07/time-to-review-student-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions from Social Liberal Forum Members to The Rt. Hon Dr Vince Cable, January 2011</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2011/03/10/questions-from-social-liberal-forum-members-to-the-rt-hon-dr-vince-cable-january-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2011/03/10/questions-from-social-liberal-forum-members-to-the-rt-hon-dr-vince-cable-january-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maryreid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon asks: The last serious survey on the subject, about 10 years ago, showed that graduates earn on average some £600,000 more than non-graduates over their working career. I don’t think there can be any debate about the fairness of &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2011/03/10/questions-from-social-liberal-forum-members-to-the-rt-hon-dr-vince-cable-january-2011/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2011/03/10/questions-from-social-liberal-forum-members-to-the-rt-hon-dr-vince-cable-january-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr. Evan Harris writes in the Guardian, and interviews Nick Clegg, regarding tuition fees</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/12/12/dr-evan-harris-writes-in-the-guardian-and-interviews-nick-clegg-regarding-tuition-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/12/12/dr-evan-harris-writes-in-the-guardian-and-interviews-nick-clegg-regarding-tuition-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prateekbuch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is little doubt that it has been a difficult week for Liberal Democrats; our Parliamentary party faced the choice between backing a rise in university tuition fees that the majority of Lib Dem voters and members do not support, &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/12/12/dr-evan-harris-writes-in-the-guardian-and-interviews-nick-clegg-regarding-tuition-fees/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/12/12/dr-evan-harris-writes-in-the-guardian-and-interviews-nick-clegg-regarding-tuition-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An open letter to Nick Clegg regarding inequality, social mobility and fairness</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/11/27/an-open-letter-to-nick-clegg-regarding-inequality-social-mobility-and-fairness/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/11/27/an-open-letter-to-nick-clegg-regarding-inequality-social-mobility-and-fairness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prateekbuch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Nick, In delivering the Hugo Young memorial lecture, you raised the challenges that progressives face in times of fiscal constraint. We share your view that these are timely and important issues to discuss. We also found much in your &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/11/27/an-open-letter-to-nick-clegg-regarding-inequality-social-mobility-and-fairness/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/11/27/an-open-letter-to-nick-clegg-regarding-inequality-social-mobility-and-fairness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Farron responds to SLF questions on the Party Presidency</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/11/03/tim-farron-responds-to-slf-questions-on-the-party-presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/11/03/tim-farron-responds-to-slf-questions-on-the-party-presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prateekbuch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both candidates for the Presidency of the Liberal Democrats have been hard at work in recent weeks, touring media outlets, local parties and online blogs (such as Liberal Democrat Voice, Liberal Vision as well as some excellent individual bloggers) putting &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/11/03/tim-farron-responds-to-slf-questions-on-the-party-presidency/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/11/03/tim-farron-responds-to-slf-questions-on-the-party-presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Liberal Forum asks candidates for the Liberal Democrat Party Presidency to share their views</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/10/15/social-liberal-forum-asks-candidates-for-the-liberal-democrat-party-presidency-to-share-their-views/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/10/15/social-liberal-forum-asks-candidates-for-the-liberal-democrat-party-presidency-to-share-their-views/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prateekbuch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following Baroness Ros Scott&#8217;s decision not to seek a second term as Party President, the race is on to become the Liberal Democrats&#8217; first new President under the Coalition government &#8211; a role that is increasingly significant given the Party&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/10/15/social-liberal-forum-asks-candidates-for-the-liberal-democrat-party-presidency-to-share-their-views/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/10/15/social-liberal-forum-asks-candidates-for-the-liberal-democrat-party-presidency-to-share-their-views/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autumn Conference motions 2 &#8211; feedback from comments so far</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/19/autumn-conference-motions-2-feedback-from-discussion-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/19/autumn-conference-motions-2-feedback-from-discussion-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wordles aren&#8217;t always as useful as they could be, but this summary of comments over the last few days about what topics the Social Liberal Forum should propose motions on at autumn conference seems quite clear: Schools is a clear &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/19/autumn-conference-motions-2-feedback-from-discussion-so-far/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/19/autumn-conference-motions-2-feedback-from-discussion-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A compelling case for a high pay commission? [Vince Cable]</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/16/a-compelling-case-for-a-high-pay-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/16/a-compelling-case-for-a-high-pay-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high pay commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maximum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vince cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Writing on Comment is Free today, Vince Cable argues: There is now a compelling case for a high pay commission to measure the claims of top earners that their rewards are justified and necessary, even if they offend natural justice &#8230; <a href="http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/16/a-compelling-case-for-a-high-pay-commission/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://socialliberal.net/2009/08/16/a-compelling-case-for-a-high-pay-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

