<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:08:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Liberal Forum &#187; Did the budget meet my tests?:</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2480</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Liberal Forum &#187; Did the budget meet my tests?:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2480</guid>
		<description>[...] What kind of tax rises? Leaving aside the Capital Gains Tax tweak, which only raises £1 bn (half the amount to be raised in the Lib Dem plan), the main hit is on VAT, both the higher and lower rates, to 20% and 6% respectively. There is no escaping from the fact that this is a total defeat for the Lib Dems in coalition. There are no new wealth taxes, despite the fact that large amounts of uneconomically productive wealth is locked up in land across the country, which in turn ensures that rent rises are artificially high (a problem exacerbated by the Housing Benefit cap) and contributes to the housing shortage. The Social Liberal Forum can point to one small victory however: the increase in personal allowance will not be passed onto people paying the higher rate of tax, something which we argued for at both the special conference and in our letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What kind of tax rises? Leaving aside the Capital Gains Tax tweak, which only raises £1 bn (half the amount to be raised in the Lib Dem plan), the main hit is on VAT, both the higher and lower rates, to 20% and 6% respectively. There is no escaping from the fact that this is a total defeat for the Lib Dems in coalition. There are no new wealth taxes, despite the fact that large amounts of uneconomically productive wealth is locked up in land across the country, which in turn ensures that rent rises are artificially high (a problem exacerbated by the Housing Benefit cap) and contributes to the housing shortage. The Social Liberal Forum can point to one small victory however: the increase in personal allowance will not be passed onto people paying the higher rate of tax, something which we argued for at both the special conference and in our letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GLA leads the way on pay ratios &#124; Left Foot Forward</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2367</link>
		<dc:creator>GLA leads the way on pay ratios &#124; Left Foot Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2367</guid>
		<description>[...] by the wealthy as a means of avoiding paying their fair share of tax.  One Society has joined with Social Liberal Forum and 38 Degrees in attempt to bring balance to the debate and persuade the government to stick to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the wealthy as a means of avoiding paying their fair share of tax.  One Society has joined with Social Liberal Forum and 38 Degrees in attempt to bring balance to the debate and persuade the government to stick to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch: Simon Hughes attacks Tory-right on VAT &#38; CGT &#124; Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch: Simon Hughes attacks Tory-right on VAT &#38; CGT &#124; Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Liberal Forum published an open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander this week, saying the budget needs to, &#8220;spells out an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Liberal Forum published an open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander this week, saying the budget needs to, &#8220;spells out an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shires &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Opinion: Liberal Democrats must not compromise on fairer taxes</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shires &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Opinion: Liberal Democrats must not compromise on fairer taxes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>[...] the Social Liberal Forum has published an open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander expressing our concerns prior to the emergency budget which will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Social Liberal Forum has published an open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander expressing our concerns prior to the emergency budget which will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>John - you seem to have some fascinating inside knowledge of the Social Liberal Forum. Perhaps you might explain where you are getting this from?

The SLF has always supported radical decentralisation.  Indeed, it is a central pillar of Reinventing the State, which is in many ways our founding document.

I don&#039;t believe we have ever written anything about housing benefit.  If people are receiving upwards of £2k a month housing benefit, they are likely to be very small in number (it certainly represents more than my annual income).  Perhaps you could source your claims?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; you seem to have some fascinating inside knowledge of the Social Liberal Forum. Perhaps you might explain where you are getting this from?</p>
<p>The SLF has always supported radical decentralisation.  Indeed, it is a central pillar of Reinventing the State, which is in many ways our founding document.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe we have ever written anything about housing benefit.  If people are receiving upwards of £2k a month housing benefit, they are likely to be very small in number (it certainly represents more than my annual income).  Perhaps you could source your claims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>@Richard - I would be happier if the SLF would devote its attentions to the political changes that are needed to address the problems of inequality but I fear it would rock too many boats in the SLF.

For instance we need a radical shift of power to the regions and to shift all of whitehall and Parliament out of London. That way there wouldn&#039;t be the huge rents required. Although I agree with the non-doms that is only one part of the equation.

Do you really think it&#039;s right for someone on JSA to be told `choose a property up to 2000 a month`  - there is no problem getting a job in London compared to other places and all that does is ensure it&#039;s cheaper for someone not to work than to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard &#8211; I would be happier if the SLF would devote its attentions to the political changes that are needed to address the problems of inequality but I fear it would rock too many boats in the SLF.</p>
<p>For instance we need a radical shift of power to the regions and to shift all of whitehall and Parliament out of London. That way there wouldn&#8217;t be the huge rents required. Although I agree with the non-doms that is only one part of the equation.</p>
<p>Do you really think it&#8217;s right for someone on JSA to be told `choose a property up to 2000 a month`  &#8211; there is no problem getting a job in London compared to other places and all that does is ensure it&#8217;s cheaper for someone not to work than to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Coe</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Coe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>What proportion of Liberal Democrat Ministers attended state schools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What proportion of Liberal Democrat Ministers attended state schools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Coe</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Coe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>@John

The people who are having it cushy are the non-doms who seem to be able to live here and even sit in Parliament without paying more that a tiny amount of tax. Given the appalling mal-distribution of wealth and income in our country - the true answer to defecit reduction lies in making sure the rich actually pay tax like the rest of us.

However with politics dominated by the very same people - we can&#039;t expect much from any of the parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John</p>
<p>The people who are having it cushy are the non-doms who seem to be able to live here and even sit in Parliament without paying more that a tiny amount of tax. Given the appalling mal-distribution of wealth and income in our country &#8211; the true answer to defecit reduction lies in making sure the rich actually pay tax like the rest of us.</p>
<p>However with politics dominated by the very same people &#8211; we can&#8217;t expect much from any of the parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinion: Liberal Democrats must not compromise on fairer taxes</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>Opinion: Liberal Democrats must not compromise on fairer taxes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>[...] the Social Liberal Forum has published an open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander expressing our concerns prior to the emergency budget which will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Social Liberal Forum has published an open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander expressing our concerns prior to the emergency budget which will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Liberal Forum &#187; Hughes, Bruce and Oakeshott express concerns over Capital Gains Tax plans:</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/06/14/open-letter-to-nick-clegg-and-danny-alexander/comment-page-1/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Liberal Forum &#187; Hughes, Bruce and Oakeshott express concerns over Capital Gains Tax plans:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=453#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>[...] on from the Social Liberal Forum&#8217;s open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander about the emergency budget, three prominent Liberal Democrat parliamentarians have echoed our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on from the Social Liberal Forum&#8217;s open letter to Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander about the emergency budget, three prominent Liberal Democrat parliamentarians have echoed our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

