<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another successful conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/another-successful-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/another-successful-conference/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/another-successful-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=382#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t talking about journalists, James! There will be some suspicion amongst your fellow party members....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t talking about journalists, James! There will be some suspicion amongst your fellow party members&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/another-successful-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=382#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>Neil,

The short answer to your question regarding Beveridge is that I don&#039;t know and it&#039;s up to them what they do with their group.  But that there has been a fair bit of crossover between the two groups from the beginning. We haven&#039;t broached them about formally combining our forces.  Perhaps this is something for the new council to discuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>The short answer to your question regarding Beveridge is that I don&#8217;t know and it&#8217;s up to them what they do with their group.  But that there has been a fair bit of crossover between the two groups from the beginning. We haven&#8217;t broached them about formally combining our forces.  Perhaps this is something for the new council to discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stretton</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/another-successful-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stretton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=382#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>I really welcome the news of a formal start up for the Forum, with membership arrangements and a constitution - such a body is long overdue !  I still look forward to hearing a reply though from my earlier post - about what is happening (happened ?!) to the Beveridge Group - is it still in existence; if so, how will there be joint working / will the organisations (if such a thing could be described for the Group !) merge ?  There seems to be much in common in the aims of the two bodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really welcome the news of a formal start up for the Forum, with membership arrangements and a constitution &#8211; such a body is long overdue !  I still look forward to hearing a reply though from my earlier post &#8211; about what is happening (happened ?!) to the Beveridge Group &#8211; is it still in existence; if so, how will there be joint working / will the organisations (if such a thing could be described for the Group !) merge ?  There seems to be much in common in the aims of the two bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/another-successful-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=382#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>The way we&#039;ve written our constitution would make that very difficult, but we&#039;ve had a weekend of journalists writing wildly speculative things about us based on the most paltry evidence so we are rapidly learning to grow thick skins!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way we&#8217;ve written our constitution would make that very difficult, but we&#8217;ve had a weekend of journalists writing wildly speculative things about us based on the most paltry evidence so we are rapidly learning to grow thick skins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/another-successful-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=382#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>Be warned - once it becomes a membership organisation, you&#039;ll be accused of wanting to split from the Liberals. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be warned &#8211; once it becomes a membership organisation, you&#8217;ll be accused of wanting to split from the Liberals. <img src='http://socialliberal.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaequam Blog! &#187; Conference and canards</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2010/03/15/another-successful-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaequam Blog! &#187; Conference and canards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=382#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>[...] Standing room only at both SLF fringes, including the one about passing a constitution. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Standing room only at both SLF fringes, including the one about passing a constitution. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

