<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labour&#8217;s Love lost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialliberal.net/2009/04/27/labours-love-lost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialliberal.net/2009/04/27/labours-love-lost/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:55:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Weber</title>
		<link>http://socialliberal.net/2009/04/27/labours-love-lost/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialliberal.net/?p=223#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Darrell,

Student loans are essentially deferred taxation. So being &quot;saddled with debt&quot; isn&#039;t actually the prohibiting factor to people on lower incomes going into HE that you claim.

I dislike tuition fees - who actually asks for them - but as someone on the full maintenance grant I do feel qualified to make some comment about the argument that tuition fees create an exclusive disincentive to poorer students.

They don&#039;t. They create a disincentive towards every student. Every student, regardless of whether they&#039;re high, low or middle income will either be faced with more up-front costs, or more taxation later on. Middle earners will pay back more in tax than lower earners later on, because they&#039;ll be earning more. So though tuition fees undeniably leave an unpleasant taste in one&#039;s mouth and are a negative consideration when looking at Higher Education, they are not the barrier to social mobility you seem to suggest they are.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darrell,</p>
<p>Student loans are essentially deferred taxation. So being &#8220;saddled with debt&#8221; isn&#8217;t actually the prohibiting factor to people on lower incomes going into HE that you claim.</p>
<p>I dislike tuition fees &#8211; who actually asks for them &#8211; but as someone on the full maintenance grant I do feel qualified to make some comment about the argument that tuition fees create an exclusive disincentive to poorer students.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t. They create a disincentive towards every student. Every student, regardless of whether they&#8217;re high, low or middle income will either be faced with more up-front costs, or more taxation later on. Middle earners will pay back more in tax than lower earners later on, because they&#8217;ll be earning more. So though tuition fees undeniably leave an unpleasant taste in one&#8217;s mouth and are a negative consideration when looking at Higher Education, they are not the barrier to social mobility you seem to suggest they are.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
