Monthly Archives: March 2009

Volunteercorps

The Ideas Factory is a chance for you to pitch your own idea of what should be in the next Liberal Democrat manifesto. The proposal here is not the policy of the Social Liberal Forum. We will however be passing it – and the response it generates – onto the Manifesto Working Group.

The Proposal

Simon Radford:If you have not read Steve Waldman’s ‘The Bill’, I would recommend it.  It follows the life cycle of a campaign promise- Bill Clinton’s pledge for a new domestic Peace corps- through the legislative process to its final implementation and legacy.  The result was ‘Americorps’.

Americorps is something that should intrigue all British liberals.  Even as we have grown more successful as a community-powered party, the viability of our communities has dwindled.  The evidence is everywhere, from the decline of local papers both in quality and quantity to the hollowing-out of the high street by out-of-town shopping behemoths.

Added to this is the ghettoisation of different communities based on income, race and other factors.  The best state schools are overwhelmingly dominated by the middle classes , just as the Grammar schools used to be.  The highest-paid jobs are dominated by those who went to the best universities.  Opportunity, if you are born in many parts of this country, is effectively denied.

Another American book, Robert Puttnam’s seminal ‘Bowling Alone’, chronicled and tabulated the decline of America’s voluntary associations and groups: from bowling teams to political meetings.  We have seen a similar decline in mass membership political parties, trades union and other groups in this country.  At the same time, the main working class employers in manufacturing have given way to smaller, less long-term employment in smaller service companies.  Making cars has turned into flipping burgers.

What these two twin phenomena – the decline of the arena for and willingness to volunteer or associate – have lead to an atomisation of individuals and a shift from a cultural  or class to an economic stratification of British society.

Liberal Democrats have many ideas to combat this drift: from local credit unions, industrial democracy, and decentralisation of taxation, services and political power.  However, what about applying also the Americacorps model to redevelop our city centres while helping people mix and meet people they otherwise would not?

Gap years tend to be confined to those from wealthier backgrounds.  They tend to be with people from the same social background and be based abroad rather than shining light on the hidden poverty in their own country.  So, why not create a Gap Year that is based at least partly in Britain, helps the very poorest in society who participants might otherwise be isolated from and sweetens the deal with some employer sponsorship for work experience to bolster their CVs as well as a small wage?

Teach First has been a real success in getting some of the best graduates into the more challenging schools and, in many cases, persuading them to stay there.  It is not hard to imagine that the skills that a wider volunteering scheme would endow its participants with, would be a very attractive proposition for employers when their course is over, as well as going a small way to introduce Britain to a part of itself that it is all to easy to either mock when Little Britain comes on the TV or worse: forget.

Responses

Richard Huzzey: New ways of encouraging volunteering – probably in partnership with existing community groups and charities – is an excellent idea. A healthy national community requires an expansive civil society. It is of course important for liberals that such work is voluntary, and not compulsory, as an alternative to national service, for example. There is a great new initiative (Student Hubs – http://studenthubs.org/) that is promoting the wide variety of volunteering opportunities for students on campuses. It sounds like this would provide similar opportunities for people to find the right opportunity for their skills and interests.

Would it provide some sort of allowance to people, to pay for them to spend a year volunteering?

Nick Clegg and today’s FT – by Gareth Epps

Today’s news that the Liberal Democrats have reviewed the pledge to cut the overall burden of taxation is timely and welcome.

It was obvious that financial pressures were disproportionately hitting those on the lowest incomes, even before the start of the recession. Labour’s 10p tax fiasco showed by public reaction that hitting the poorest is not only no way to achieve a fair society – it offended the public as a whole.

Liberals should applaud a commitment to tax the lowest paid, less. That commitment must go hand in hand with measures that promote equality; as we recently confirmed, extending access to further and higher education, as well as committing to invest in vital infrastructure works that create jobs, are the right answers in the teeth of a financial crisis. Those commitments cannot be lost amid the well-trailed squeeze on public finances.

Neither, however, can Liberal Democrats avoid facing up to a financial squeeze that looks inevitable regardless of the colour of the carpets in Number 10 in 2010. The early thinking is promising. There is no shortage of waste within the public sector, and social Liberals cannot be too unhappy about the areas Nick Clegg has earmarked in his interview with the FT. What is now needed – as far as it is possible – is clarity of an approach that protects the most critical elements of our public services, in order to avoid the obvious attack from the Left that a review of public spending – even if that means scrapping Trident – is in some way an attack on those core services.

Today’s statement also helps by putting right what appeared to be a fudge; that statement of wider, unspecified tax cuts last Autumn rapidly looked hard to achieve. Nick Clegg has sharpened the focus of the Liberal Democrat message, and done so in a way that strengthens our position as the only party committed to greater equality and social justice.

Gareth Epps is leader of the Lib Dem Council Group in Reading and the candidate in Reading East

Reinventing the State (for a tenner)

rtscover100The new printing of Reinventing the State is now available for sale on the Methuen Bookshop at the special discount price of £10 including postage (RRP £14.99). Get your copy today!

No turning back? A response to Compass

At the launch of the Social Liberal Forum in Harrogate, there was considerable enthusiasm among those attending for talking to people outside the Liberal Democrats where there is scope for developing policy ideas together. One organisation specifically suggested was Compass.

Coincidentally, an article appeared in the New Statesman just a few days ago which suggests just how much common ground there is for such discussions with Compass. In ‘No Turning Back’, the Compass Chair, Neal Lawson, and journalist John Harris, put forward perspectives which I think many Liberal Democrats share, and which I believe we should engage with constructively. Continue reading

Report from Social Liberal Forum Launch

Matthew Sowemimo helping launch Social Liberal Forum (@soclib... on TwitPic

The launch of the Social Liberal Forum in Harrogate was a truly excellent meeting – I don’t think I have ever come across so much enthusiasm at such an event.

Kicking off the discussions, Matthew Sowemimo spoke with great conviction about the importance of tackling child poverty in a far more ambitious way than Labour have done. The main speaker at the event, Steve Webb told his personal story about why he joined the Liberal Democrats. He argued that we all join the party with specific enthusiasms and causes for which we want to fight, and he said that we need to restore some of the passion to the way we tell people what we stand for.

A wide range of contributions came from those attending the meeting. These included: the need to examine the best ways to tackle anti-social behaviour; putting industrial democracy back at the forefront of our economic policies; giving a higher profile to fuel poverty; the need to spend more on social housing; and a desire to talk about policy to those with similar perspectives from outside the Liberal Democrats. Lynne Featherstone made a powerful contribution arguing that in the current economic crisis, we need to articulate a vision which shows we don’t just want to go back to how things were before the crisis, but that we offer a very different, and better, future.

The engagement of party members in the overall aims of the SLF was really encouraging, and in the months to come, we will be working on developing the ideas put forward.

A ‘Citizen Endowment’ for an active and balanced democracy

The Ideas Factory is a chance for you to pitch your own idea of what should be in the next Liberal Democrat manifesto. The proposal here is not the policy of the Social Liberal Forum. We will however be passing it – and the response it generates – onto the Manifesto Working Group.

The Proposal

Ed Randall: The author of Supercapitalism, Robert Reich, who was Labor Secretary in the Clinton administration, brilliantly explains how the ways in which we behave as consumers and investors have given rise to a monster. The monster is eroding community and civic virtue, undermining citizen involvement in democracy and destroying democratic accountability. Although his analysis is stronger than his prescription for invigorating democracy his book contains the seed of a policy idea that should appeal to Liberal Democrats. It certainly appeals to me. Continue reading

A full-blooded commitment to going local

The Ideas Factory is a chance for you to pitch your own idea of what should be in the next Liberal Democrat manifesto. The proposal here is not the policy of the Social Liberal Forum. We will however be passing it – and the response it generates – onto the Manifesto Working Group.

The Proposal

David Heigham: Our power to decide locally has been centralised, is still drifting to Whitehall, and should go back where it belongs. Continue reading