Social Liberal Forum » :

New Demos pamphlet makes the Lib Dem case for equality

Posted by James Graham on February 9, 2010 at 1:24 am.

In association with The Equality Trust, Demos have today published three pamphlets focusing on equality from the perspective of each of the main political parties. The Liberal Democrat one, A Wealth of Opportunity, is written by Julia Margo and William Bradley and has a foreword by David Laws MP.

A concern with inequality lies deep in liberal DNA. More than a century and a half ago, John Stuart Mill argued for a cap on inheritance so that wealth might be more fairly distributed in society. His views jarred with Victorian attitudes. Would they be more accepted now?

This pamphlet argues for a renewed liberal equality agenda, based on evidence of the divisive impact of inequality on society and recent findings of the central role that financial security and access to resource plays in life chances and child development.

The Liberal Democrats face a unique opportunity: concern for economic inequality has never been more fashionable or higher in the public mind than in this post- recession era and following the double-scandal of MPs expenses and bankers bonuses. In the wake of the Labour government’s failure to effectively tackle inequality, a radical agenda focused on redistributing resource, capitalising disadvantaged families and improving services would cement the reputation of the Liberal Democrats as the vanguard of the contemporary progressive left.

The book makes three main policy recommendations for the Liberal Democrats to adopt:

  • Tax wealth via land value taxation and replacing inheritence tax with an acquisitions tax.
  • Introduce a capabilities boost to benefits and services by increasing benefit and tax credit levels for the working poor, additional resources for early years education for children from disadvantaged backgrounds and focusing Sure Start on programmes with a proven impact on child well-being, capability development and parenting.
  • Capitalise low income families by raising the minimum wage, entitling low income families to a £500 lump sum on the birth of a child, refocusing child benefit so that it is higher for younger children and encouraging people on low incomes to save via a system of matched funding.

The pamphlet can be downloaded for free on the Demos website.  You can also download their pamphlet aimed at Labour, Society of Equals and the Conservatives, Everyday Equality.

The Ideas Factory

News Roundup

Posted by James Graham on February 3, 2010 at 4:15 pm.

The Guardian continues its coverage of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes ongoing woes.

It also carries an interview with Conservative leader of Barnet Council Mike Freer and his “easyCouncil” model (as a Barnet resident, I was interested to see that my council tax was spent on clearing up all the grit on the pavement on Monday and putting back more grit on Tuesday – value for money FTW!).

The Tories have been attacked for publishing misleading crime statistics in such a way that makes a couple of cock ups by the IPCC look insignificant. Chris Grayling is unreprentent.

And finally, Gordon Brown announced a range of intended constitutional reforms yesterday in a speech to the RSA. Most of the coverage has focused on his plans for a referendum to reform the electoral system, but more radically he also announced his intention for the UK to have a written constitution by the 800th anniversary of the signing of the Magna Carta in 2015. Exciting stuff but given Brown’s track record, could he deliver?

The Spirit Level in 3 minutes

Posted by James Graham on February 3, 2010 at 3:20 pm.

A short film to promote The Spirit Level, the paperback edition of which came out this week:

Okay, it ever so slightly over-eggs the pudding, but it is good fun nonetheless.

The Social Liberal Forum will be running a joint fringe with the Equality Trust at the Liberal Democrat Spring Conference in March. More details soon.

News Roundup

Posted by James Graham on February 2, 2010 at 11:12 am.

Climate change science has been dealt another blow by the revelation that University of East Anglia professor Phil Jones knowingly used flawed evidence in one of his studies.  How many more revelations like this will we have before the scientific community learn the lesson that transparency is the only way to ensure public trust?

Meanwhile, a man not especially reknowned for his valuing of science, Pope Benedict, has been condemning UK equality laws.  Some people are more equal than others in the eye of God, it would seem.

Talking of equality, Gordon Brown appears to have finally come off the fence when it comes to electoral reform.  The Alternative Vote system isn’t proportional but it would mean all MPs would have to command a majority and it would mean fewer wasted votes.  The Lib Dem response, as Stephen Tall points out, has been a “stinging welcome“.  It would appear that the government will be announcing support for a whole host of amendments to the Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill today, including ones regarding Lords reform and excluding non-doms from Parliament.

The latest ComRes/Independent poll confirms that the gap in support between the main parties has narrowed in recent weeks, with the public deeply confused about what passes for David Cameron’s economic policy.  Interestingly, Tory support amongst men is currently much higher than Tory support amongst women.

News roundup

Posted by James Graham on February 1, 2010 at 12:09 pm.

Labour is reported to be putting cooperative principles at the heart of its 2010 manifesto.  Anyone remember the third way?

Nick Clegg is spelling out today how the Liberal Democrats propose to pay for its flagship ‘pupil premium‘ policy for education.

David Cameron is continuing to confuse over both the economy and human rights.  Despite the Tory policy of making immediate cuts, we are now to understand they won’t be ’swingeing’.  Meanwhile, he has asserted that burglars lose their human rights as soon as they set foot in someone else’s property, suggesting he is not so much in support of ‘have a go heroes’ as ‘have a gimp heroes’.

Head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Rajendra Pachauri’s position is looking increasingly untenable with the revelation that he sat on the discovery that one of the IPCC’s claims about melting glaciers was without foundation before the Copenhagen summit. Other claims are being disputed as well.  With the scientific community still reeling from the University of East Anglia email hacking scandal, it is clear that a concerted effort needs to be made to ensure that climate science is seen to be robust and open to scrutiny.

Social Liberal Forum Newsletter

Posted by James Graham on November 10, 2009 at 5:10 am.

Sorry we’ve been quiet for the last few weeks – for reasons that will become apparent below.  We had a tremendously successful conference season and would like to welcome everyone who signed up to this newsletter at one or other of our fringe meetings.

CONTINUITY AND CHANGE

The Social Liberal Forum executive has undergone some significant changes over the past couple of months.  Sadly, Richard Grayson and Alison Goldsworthy have resigned from the executive.  Alison has had to leave due to other work commitments while Richard is working hard on the party’s Federal Policy Committee and Manifesto Working Group.  We wish them both the best of luck and would like to take this opportunity to thank them for helping to get the SLF on its feet during its first few months.

The remaining executive members – Director Matthew Sowemimo and Secretary James Graham – are being joined by David Hall-Matthews and Peter Kunzmann.  David is a respected academic and a former Lib Dem candidate (Leeds North West, 2001) who readers of Reinventing The State may recall contributed a chapter on international development.  He takes over from Richard as the Chair of the organisation.  Peter has worked for the party and a number of MPs over the years and has a special interest in using public policy to promote happiness.

The one thing our change in personel has highlighted is the need for the SLF to get itself on a firmer democratic footing.  This has always been part of our plans after the general election, but we have decided to bring these forward.  Watch this space for more information.

MANIFESTO PRIORITIES

The new Social Liberal Forum executive has published a joint statement on what we see are the key priorities for the next Liberal Democrat manifesto.  These include:

  • A firm commitment to reduce income inequality over the course of the next Parliament;
  • The richest in society should take a greater part of the strain in reducing the budget deficit and we should present ourselves as the party of fair, redistributive taxation;
  • A low carbon economy and a global climate change agreement based on the principles of contraction and convergence;
  • Youth unemployment should be another priority – the party is right to stick with its commitment to scrap tuition fees.

The full statement can be found here.

SOCIAL NETWORK

Many thanks to the dozens of you who have joined our Social Network over the past few weeks.  If you have not done so already, please do: http://socialliberal.ning.com/

Although only early days yet, this Social Network is set to be crucial tool for coordinating our activities.  Please join so we can keep you better in touch.

Cheers,

James Graham
Social Liberal Forum

Manifesto Priorities – A Statement from the Social Liberal Forum Executive

Posted by James Graham on November 10, 2009 at 4:28 am.

As the Liberal Democrats move towards finalizing the party’s manifesto, The Social Liberal Forum sets out the key principles that we believe should be the basis for formulating tax policy and spending commitments:

  • The party should commit itself to the goal of reducing income inequality over the next parliament. Proposals to reduce public spending should be assessed in terms of whether they further that objective.
  • Tax increases for the richest members of society should take the greater part of the strain in reducing the budget deficit in order to protect vulnerable users of public services, like housing, health services and social care. In 1993 the Clinton Administration faced with a big structural budget deficit expressly chose to use tax increases rather than spending cuts as the major means of deficit reduction.
  • We should be the party of fair, redistributive taxation. We welcome the proposal to include a 0.5% property tax on mansions over £1 million and see this as an addition to our reconfirmed policy of replacing the Council Tax and replacing it with a Local Income Tax.
  • Immediate action to further the transition to a sustainable, low carbon economy is essential and this goal should substantially influence tax and spending policies. A global climate change agreement should be based on the principles of contraction and convergence.
  • Reducing youth unemployment should be another priority for the next government. Academic evidence has shown that youth unemployment generates serious losses in lifetime earnings that can persist up to twenty years after a period of unemployment. In the last two recessions large numbers of people out of work for long periods became stigmatized, depressed and hard to place – a phenomenon known as ‘scarring.’
  • The abolition of tuition fees is important so that students from working class communities do not face the re-imposition of barriers at university level. Our policy on fees has been reaffirmed at the Harrogate Conference and by FPC. The policy is right and is popular.

We believe applying the principles outlined above to policy development would make a reality of calls for progressive austerity.

The Social Liberal Forum Executive

Congratulations to Centre Forum

Posted by James Graham on October 22, 2009 at 1:52 am.

Belated congratulations to Centre Forum, and in particular Giles Wilkes, for winning Prospect Magazines’ Think Tank Publication of the Year Award for A Balancing Act: Fair Solutions to the Modern Debt Crisis.

One of the many things I meant to do this summer was to write a review of this pamphlet.  It is a highly readable account of the financial mess we are in and challenges a lot of assumptions – in particular George Osborne’s apocalyptic insistance that cutting public borrowing is the main priority and that the situation is analogous to where the UK was at in the late-70s/early-80s.  It also proposes the introduction of a property tax – albeit at a higher rate than the one Vince Cable is now proposing.

It is a well deserved award and congratulations to all concerned.

Events in October as if people mattered

Posted by James Graham on October 5, 2009 at 11:00 pm.

Guest article by Geoffrey G J Payne

Soon after I joined the Liberal party in 1983 I discovered something that surprised me. Many of the best Liberals were not members of the party, and some were even members of other parties. This presented both a challenge and an opportunity. It was frustrating that these people were not in the party helping develop it’s political position. Yet clearly the potential was there; a Liberal party that could reach out to people beyond it’s current core supporters.

And that is how it has remained ever since. Today when you go to Lib Dem conference, the event is dominated by “Think Tanks”. The one that dominates is Centre Forum, of which I am a member. We should be grateful for the work Centre Forum does of course, and personally I would commend them for the work they did on the pupil premium (albeit I think they have more thinking to do on this policy, but that is another story). Generally however their pamphlets are either dull or on the odd occasion somewhat objectionable, at least from a Social Liberal perspective. On the other hand, Centre Forum are at their best at conference where they dominate the fringe meeting circuit.

So is there a better alternative for Social Liberals? Already links are being made with Compass, and another Think Tank I would recommend we take notice of is the New Economics Foundation (NEF).

Take a look at their website and ask why are Centre Forum not saying this? The difference of course is that Centre Forum are preoccupied with “free markets”, whilst NEF is about (to quote Fritz Schumacher) “economics as if people matter”. I would prefer to define “economic liberalism” more by the latter than the former.

Schumacher himself inspired the Schumacher Society, which has close links with NEF.

They are having their annual conference on the 17th October in Bristol, see http://www.schumacher.org.uk/.

Then on the following Saturday in London NEF have organised this following conference: The Bigger Picture.

If Social Liberal need more ideas to advance their cause, then this is the place to be this October.

Social Liberal Forum and Compass announce “coalition of progressive ideas”

Posted by James Graham on September 21, 2009 at 9:18 pm.

Social Liberal Forum Secretary James Graham and Chair of Compass Neal Lawson have an article in Tuesday’s Guardian calling for a “coalition of progressive ideas” between social liberals and liberal socialists within the Liberal Democrats, Labour and more widely.

Progressives in all these parties are committed to greater equality and dealing with the challenge of climate change, but the binding value is pluralism. We recognise the value of difference, distinct histories and tradition but are using them to develop a shared project that is stronger because it is based on consensus-building. What we seek is not a big tent – that has been tried and failed – but a camp site where we keep our independence but grow stronger within common boundaries. This is not a coalition of parties and votes but of ideas and hope.

You can read the full article online here.

If you would like to be part of the debate, please join our social network today.